Definition
Voluntary sexual intercourse by a married person outside marriage.
A ground for divorce and formerly a criminal offence — voluntary sexual intercourse by a married person with someone other than their spouse.
Statutory Definition
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 13(1)(i) (civil ground for divorce); IPC Section 497 struck down by Supreme Court in 2018.
Etymology & Origin
From Latin 'adulterium' (corruption, defilement — from 'adulterare', to corrupt, adulterate — 'ad', to, and 'alter', another). Adultery was originally conceived as a 'corruption' of the marital bond — an 'adulteration' of the pure marital relationship by bringing in another person. The root 'alter' (other) is visible in the concept — adultery involves the 'other' person.
Full Legal Analysis
Adultery is voluntary sexual intercourse by a married person with someone other than their lawful spouse. In Indian law, adultery has undergone a dramatic transformation: it was formerly both a ground for divorce and a criminal offence (IPC Section 497), but the criminal provision was struck down by the Supreme Court in 2018. Today, adultery remains a ground for divorce under Section 13(1)(i) HMA (and equivalent provisions under other personal laws) but is no longer a crime.
Adultery as a civil ground for divorce: Section 13(1)(i) HMA provides that any marriage may be dissolved by a decree of divorce on the ground that the respondent has, after the solemnisation of the marriage, had voluntary sexual intercourse with any person other than their spouse. The petitioning spouse must prove: (1) voluntary sexual intercourse (not rape); (2) with a person other than the spouse; (3) after the solemnisation of the marriage; and (4) by the respondent (the other spouse). Direct evidence of adultery is rarely available — courts infer it from circumstantial evidence (opportunity + inclination: the parties were together in circumstances where intercourse was possible and had a disposition toward it).
A five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court unanimously struck down Section 497 IPC (criminal adultery) as unconstitutional, holding that: (1) it violated the right to equality (Article 14) by treating women as the property of their husbands (the wife of the adulterous husband had no recourse under Section 497); (2) it violated Article 21 by interfering with an individual's sexual autonomy and dignity; and (3) it was based on a patriarchal and paternalistic conception of women as chattel. The Court held that the State has no business criminalising consensual sexual relations between adults in private — adultery can remain a ground for divorce but cannot be a crime.
Standard of proof in civil adultery cases: in civil divorce proceedings, the standard is the civil standard — balance of probabilities, not proof beyond reasonable doubt. However, because of the seriousness of the allegation (stigma equivalent to a criminal charge), courts in practice require strong and convincing evidence before finding adultery proved on the balance of probabilities. Circumstantial evidence — hotel receipts, telephone records, birth of a child outside the marriage's probable period, private investigator reports — are typically used.
For advocates, adultery grounds in divorce proceedings require: (1) assembling circumstantial evidence showing opportunity and inclination — the respondent's relationship with the third party and their physical proximity; (2) DNA evidence where the question of paternity of a child is relevant; (3) responding to adultery allegations — challenging the circumstantial evidence and the inference drawn; and (4) advising clients that adultery by either spouse may affect maintenance (a spouse who has committed adultery may receive reduced maintenance, though no automatic forfeiture rule exists).
This Term in Indian Statutes
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, 1955
"The respondent has, after the solemnisation of the marriage, had voluntary sexual intercourse with any person other than his or her spouse."
Joseph Shine: IPC 497 criminal adultery struck down as unconstitutional (2018); remains civil ground for divorce; circumstantial evidence — opportunity + inclination; balance of probabilities standard
