Self Incrimination / Nemo tenetur seipsum accusare /

self in-krim-uh-NAY-shun

Right against self-incrimination.

Quick Reference

CrPC 161
BNSS 180
IEA 25
BSA 23
~6 min read 62 views Featured Term high confidence

Definition

Right to Silence Protection against Self-Incrimination

Right against self-incrimination.

No person shall be compelled to be witness against himself.

Statutory Definition

Article 20(3) Constitution.

Etymology & Origin

Derived from the Latin maxim 'Nemo tenetur seipsum accusare' (No man is obliged to be a witness against himself). It evolved to prevent the use of torture to extract confessions.

Full Legal Analysis

The protection against Self-Incrimination is a fundamental constitutional right guaranteeing that a person accused of a crime cannot be forced by the police, courts, or the state to provide evidence or testimony that would prove their own guilt. It is the foundation of the 'Right to Silence'.

This right protects an accused person from physical coercion, psychological pressure, or legal compulsion aimed at extracting a confession. If an accused chooses to remain silent during police interrogation or in court, that silence cannot be legally construed as an admission of guilt.

Constitution of India — Article 20(3): No person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself.

However, this protection is limited to 'testimonial compulsion' (giving verbal or written statements conveying personal knowledge). It does not protect an accused from being compelled to provide physical evidence, such as giving a blood sample, fingerprints, handwriting specimens, or standing for an identification parade.

Nandini Satpathy v. P.L. Dani (1978) 2 SCC 424
The Supreme Court expansively interpreted Article 20(3), stating that 'compulsion' includes not just physical torture but psychological pressure, and affirmed that an accused has the right to remain silent if the answer to a question exposes them to criminal liability.
Selvi v. State of Karnataka (2010) 7 SCC 263
The Court ruled that involuntary administration of Narcoanalysis, Brain Mapping, and Polygraph tests violates Article 20(3) as the subject does not exercise conscious control over their responses.

For defence advocates, invoking Article 20(3) is crucial when clients are subjected to aggressive custodial interrogation, and it forms the basis for striking down forced confessions under the Evidence Act.

This Term in Indian Statutes

Constitution Article 20(3)
strict

Constitution of India, 1950

"No person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself."

The bedrock constitutional guarantee protecting the right to silence.

Other Legislation

Constitution of India, 1950 Article 20(3)
Login to Suggest

Visitor No. 550034