PFI Members Bail Cancelled by the Supreme Court; Ordered to Surrender

The National Investigation Agency (NIA) filed an appeal against the granting of bail by the Madras High Court to several respondents accused of involvement with the Popular Front of India (PFI). The NIA's appeals stemmed from their assertion that the High Court of Judicature at Madras erred in granting bail to these individuals, as a prima facie case existed suggesting their involvement in activities violating the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1957 (UAPA).,br.

During the pendency of the said Appeals, the chargesheet came to be filed by the appellant-NIA against all the respondents along with other accused on 17.03.2023 for the offences under Sections 120B, 121A, 122, 153A, 505(1)(b), (c), (2) of IPC and Sections 13,18, 18A, 18B of UAPA, alleging a conspiracy to commit terrorist acts and incite violence. The Supreme Court, referencing its previous rulings in Watali's Case and Gurwinder Singh vs. State of Punjab, reversed the High Court's decision, emphasizing the gravity of the alleged offenses and the potential threat to national security.

Overturning Madras High Court’s decision that granted them bail to PFI members, the Supreme Court of India has ordered the immediate surrender of several members of the Popular Front of India (PFI).

The Indian government designated the PFI an "unlawful association" and banned the organization under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) in 2022. And the National Investigation Agency (NIA) conducted an investigation into the PFI, alleging that the group, while publicly advocating for minority rights, was covertly working to radicalize individuals and undermine India's democracy and integrity. The NIA investigation found evidence of PFI members engaging in recruitment efforts, providing weapons training, and preparing for terrorist activities with the goal of establishing Islamic rule in India.

The Supreme Court, in its ruling, determined that the High Court erred in its assessment of the evidence and in granting bail. The Court stated that the collected materials and witness statements present "reasonable grounds for believing that the accusations against the respondents-accused are prima facie true." The Court further asserted that the gravity of the alleged offenses, combined with the prior criminal histories of the accused and the potential threat to national security, warranted their immediate surrender and a denial of bail.

The accused individuals are to be tried at a Special Court with instructions to conduct proceedings as quickly as possible. The Supreme Court's decision reflects the serious nature of the accusations against the PFI members and underscores the Indian government's commitment to combating terrorism and safeguarding national security.

Coram: Hon'ble Justice Bela M. Trivedi & Justice Pankaj Mithal
CRLA Nos. 98, 114, and 116 of 2023.
Between: Union Of India Vs Barakathullah
Dated: May 22, 2024.
Click here for Judgement Copy