Attempt

uh-TEMPT

Doing an act towards the commission of an offence that is not completed.

Quick Reference

IPC 511
BNS 62
~4 min read 2 views high confidence

Definition

Criminal Attempt Section 511 IPC Inchoate Offence

Doing an act towards the commission of an offence that is not completed.

An unsuccessful effort to commit an offence — where a person does an act with the intent to commit the offence, the act falls short of the complete offence but goes beyond mere preparation.

Statutory Definition

BNS 2023, Section 62 (general provision on attempt, formerly IPC Section 511); specific offences also have built-in attempt provisions.

Etymology & Origin

From Latin 'attemptare' (to try, attempt — from 'ad', to, and 'temptare', to try, test). 'Attempt' is literally 'trying toward' something — making an effort directed at achieving a result. The legal concept captures the criminal intention expressed through action that falls short of the completed offence.

Full Legal Analysis

Criminal attempt is the doing of an act, with intent to commit an offence, that falls short of the completed offence but goes beyond mere preparation. Section 62 of the BNS, 2023 (formerly Section 511 IPC) provides a general provision on attempt: whoever attempts to commit an offence punishable under BNS with imprisonment for life or imprisonment, and in such attempt does any act towards the commission of that offence, shall, where no express provision is made by BNS for the punishment of such attempt, be punished with imprisonment of any description provided for the offence, for a term which may extend to one-half of the imprisonment for life or, as the case may be, one-half of the longest term of imprisonment provided for that offence, or with fine, or with both.

The critical distinction: preparation vs attempt. Preparation is the stage before the attempt — acquiring materials, forming a plan. A person cannot ordinarily be convicted for mere preparation. The attempt begins when the accused moves from preparing to performing — taking the first overt step toward the commission of the offence. The test is: (a) did the accused have the intention to commit the offence; and (b) did they do an act that was proximate to the commission of the offence? There is no single bright line — courts use a 'proximity test' or 'direct step' test: has the accused directly moved to put the criminal plan into execution?

BNS, 2023 — Section 62 (Punishment for Attempting to Commit Offences) — formerly IPC Section 511: Section 62: Whoever attempts to commit an offence punishable under this Sanhita with imprisonment for life or imprisonment, or to cause such an offence to be committed, and in such attempt does any act towards the commission of that offence, shall, where no express provision is made under this Sanhita for the punishment of such attempt, be punished with imprisonment of any description provided for the offence, for a term which may extend to one-half of the imprisonment for life or, as the case may be, one-half of the longest term of imprisonment provided for that offence, or with such fine as is provided for the offence, or with both.
Abhayanand Mishra v. State of Bihar AIR 1961 SC 1698
The Supreme Court laid down the test for criminal attempt. The accused had submitted false certificates to the Patna University for admission to the M.A. examination. The Court held that an attempt to commit an offence begins when preparation ends — when the accused begins to do the act which, if uninterrupted, would constitute the completed offence. The Court held that the accused's act of submitting false certificates to the university was the first step in the execution of the intended fraud — it was an act beyond preparation and constituted an attempt to cheat, even though the university had not yet been deceived. The test: has the accused crossed from preparation into the execution of the criminal plan?

Impossible attempt: an attempt to commit an offence that would have been impossible to complete (e.g., attempting to pick an empty pocket, administering a non-fatal dose of a supposed poison that is actually harmless) may still constitute a criminal attempt. Under English law and IPC Section 511 (followed in India), the 'impossibility' of the act does not negate the attempt — the accused's intention and the act toward the offence are sufficient. However, if the act is not one that comes within the definition of the offence even if completed (e.g., shooting at a stuffed bear thinking it is a person — not manslaughter even if 'completed' because no person was at risk), the question of criminal attempt becomes more complex.

For advocates, attempt charges arise in: (1) murder attempt — Section 109 BNS (attempt to commit murder), where the act was done with the intention to murder but death did not result; (2) attempt to cheat — Section 319 BNS, where the deceptive act was done but the delivery was not obtained; (3) preparation vs attempt distinction — often the key battleground; and (4) specific attempt provisions — some BNS sections (robbery, dacoity) include attempt within the same section rather than relying on the general Section 62.

This Term in Indian Statutes

BNS 62
neutral

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, 2023

"Whoever attempts to commit an offence punishable under this Sanhita with imprisonment for life or imprisonment, or to cause such an offence to be committed, and in such attempt does any act towards the commission of that offence, shall, where no express provision is made under this Sanhita for the punishment of such attempt, be punished with imprisonment of any description provided for the offence, for a term which may extend to one-half of the imprisonment for life."

Abhayanand Mishra: preparation vs attempt — execution begins = attempt; impossible attempt still punishable if intention and act present; Section 62: half the punishment of the completed offence; specific offences have built-in attempt provisions

Visitor No. 412659